Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12586 11
Original file (12586 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN

Docket No. 12586-11
24 February 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF {ig
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/031
of 24 Jan 12

(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to
E-6/DC1 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 13 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
Docket No. 12586-11

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/DC1 from the March 2011
Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of
16 December 2011, and a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2011.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

[blz f WE

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, II
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

24 February 2012

to Nope
eaeeneies rector

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12739 11

    Original file (12739 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-4/PR3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11006 11

    Original file (11006 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he advanced to E-4/CTR3 from the September 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05938-12

    Original file (05938-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-5/A02 from the February 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05834 12

    Original file (05834 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    —_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket: 05834-12 13 November 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO '? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the March 2011...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8582-13

    Original file (NR8582-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    requesting, in é¢ffect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00359 12

    Original file (00359 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/CTI1 from the September 2009 Navy -wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00402 12

    Original file (00402 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    00402-12 12 March 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 2 ae Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was selection board eligible from the E-7/QMC January 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination and was selected for advancement. The Board, consisting of Messrs....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08321 12

    Original file (08321 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket: 08321-12 13 November 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO [? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the September 2011...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06679 12

    Original file (06679 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced from the August 2010 E-5/IS2 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ruskin, George and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3473-13

    Original file (NR3473-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/AZ2 from the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination and for the change in rank to be reflected on her DD Form 214. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and,. Pursuant to the...